F. Cerundolo
To Win
H. Mayot
To Win
Federico Gaio vs Harold Mayot Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L W W L
Form
W L W W L W L W W WH2H: Gaio 1 - 2 Mayot
They have played 7 sets in total, with Gaio winning 3 and Mayot winning 4. The last match between Gaio and Mayot was at the Olbia Challenger, 17-10-2023, First, Hard with Federico Gaio getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Federico Gaio | 1 |
| Harold Mayot | 2 |
Olbia Challenger(17-10-2023)
6
2
6
0
| Gaio | Stats | Mayot |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (11-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 741 | Ranking | 160 |
| 124 | Highest Rank | 103 |
| 33 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 2 |
| 55% (526-439) | Career Total W/L | 54% (171-143) |
| $392,005 | Career Prize Money | $247,770 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Andreeva VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Krueger VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Federico Gaio
Player
Harold Mayot
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Federico Gaio
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Federico Gaio
54%
(
74 of
137)
1st Serve %
50%
(
51 of
103)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
48%
(
30 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
37%
(
51 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
103)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 36 | Games Won | 33 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:45:5 | Average Match Time | 1:45:5 |
| 54% (107/200) | 1st Serve % | 55% (134/244) |
| 73% (78/107) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (91/134) |
| 58% (54/93) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (54/110) |
| 28% (8/29) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (7/13) |
| 41% (99/244) | Return Points Win % | 34% (68/200) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Federico Gaio
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Gabriele Bosio
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
88%
(
53 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Gianluca Carlini
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Federico Gaio
44%
(
40 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Filippo Romano
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
61 of
107)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Alessandro Dragoni
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
9
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Federico Gaio
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Egor Gerasimov
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Blake Mott
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Harold Mayot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Corentin Moutet
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Tristan Boyer
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Harold Mayot
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
8
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Aslan Karatsev
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
44
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Harold Mayot
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
55%
(
72 of
132)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
8
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
0
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
53%
(
32 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
39%
(
51 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
87)
109
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Edas Butvilas
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Harold Mayot
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (526/439) | Win/Loss | 54% (171/143) |
| 53% (1205/1068) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (387/333) |
| 51% (11068/10593) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3557/3326) |
| 55% (136/111) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (45/37) |
| 57% (334/256) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (57/46) |
| 45% (51/63) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (60/55) |
| 36% (5/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 3004 | Aces Total | 1475 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2390 | Total Double Faults | 805 |
| 1:9:27 | Average Match Time | 1:38:23 |
| 556.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 367.85 |
| 58% (27135/47153) | 1st Serve % | 61% (13341/21787) |
| 71% (19324/27135) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (9266/13341) |
| 51% (10139/20018) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4251/8446) |
| 39% (1750/4458) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (891/2090) |
| 38% (18415/48497) | Return Points Win % | 39% (8401/21575) |
| 32% (12/26) | Slam W/L | 41% (7/10) |
| 23% (3/10) | Masters W/L | 54% (7/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (21/31) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (16/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (270/257) | Challenger W/L | 55% (92/76) |
| 66% (220/115) | Futures W/L | 60% (49/33) |
| 54% (515/949) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (163/295) |
| 67% (6/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 46% (141/309) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (41/98) |
| 54% (183/340) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (47/94) |
| 85% (511/435) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (161/144) |
| 15% (511/76) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (161/17) |
| 20% (454/90) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (153/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
